Numerous assessments, such as the ACT or annual academic achievement tests, exist to identify students’ academic skill strengths and needs. Only a few assessments exist to identify non-academic postsecondary education interests and skills, and two of these are described below.
Preparation for post-secondary academic or experience-based educational programs involves assessing, teaching, and providing experiences that enable students to learn needed skills. To prepare students, Martin et al. (2003) suggested IEP teams:
Because so few secondary transition assessments with ample supporting validity evidence exist, educators often must use informal assessments with little to no supporting validity evidence to assist in post-secondary transition planning (Martin, 2013). The Landmark Guide to Assessing College Readiness tool lacks ample supporting validity evidence, so it must be considered an informal assessment. The Postsecondary Education and Experience Assessment has strong content validity because its items come directly from applications used by programs across the country. This tool still needs additional evidence to be considered an assessment with ample supporting validity evidence. Based upon Prince et al.’s (2014) recommendation derived from federal district court findings, if educators use one or more transition assessments with ample validity evidence as part of a student’s transition assessment battery, the IEP team can use the Landmark Guide to Assessing College Readiness or the Postsecondary Education and Experience Assessment to assist with decision making and identification of strengths and needs as long as another assessment with ample validity evidence is also used.
Conversation between students, parents, and educators unlock the benefits of using both the Landmark Guide to Assessing College Readiness and The Postsecondary Education and Experience Assessment. As parents or educators complete the Landmark Guide to Assessing College Readiness with their students, they discuss each item and possible results. Use of this tool provides three useful benefits. First, it will issue an overall score with guidelines on interpreting the results. Second, users gain a better understanding of students’ current skills and what needs to be learned to attain the desired postsecondary education outcome. Third, educators may include assessment results (i.e., strengths, needs, overall summary score) in students’ IEPs. Talking about each item and discussing the meaning of the overall score may solidify students’ existing postsecondary goals or provide the opportunity to alter them.
Unlike the Landmark Guide to Assessing College Readiness, the Postsecondary Education and Experience Assessment instructions exclude students from completing the assessment as it is designed to be completed by the teacher and parent. After completing the tool, however, educators and parents may review the results with students and solicit student input. Completing the Postsecondary Education and Experience Assessment provides students and parents the opportunity to learn skills needed to attend a postsecondary college experience program. When completed, the results of the assessment may prompt completion of an actual postsecondary experience education program application. Alternatively, after reviewing results, students and family members may decide on a different postsecondary outcome. As with all transition assessments, educators may pull strengths and needs from the assessment results to include in their students’ IEPs.
College Readiness Assessment
The College Readiness Assessment is an educator-modified version of the Landmark Guide to Assessing College Readiness. It looks similar to the Landmark Guide, and it contains an additional five items to assess the added Postsecondary Education construct. Many educators believe these additional items make this a more useful transition assessment.
Burnes, J. J., Martin, J. E., Terry, R. McConnell, A. E., & Hennessey, M. N. (2018). Predicting postsecondary education and employment outcomes using results from the Transition Assessment and Goal Generator (TAGG). Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 41, 111-121. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/10.1177/2165143417705353
Madaus, J. W., Dukes III, L. L., Martin, J. E., & Morningstar, M. (2013). Postsecondary education assessment: Practices to document student progress, preferences, and interests related to postsecondary education and learning. In C. A. Thoma & R. Tamura (Eds.), Demystifying transition assessment (pp. 69-82). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
Martin, J. D. (2013). Examining the measurement invariance of the Transition Assessment and Goal Generator across per-cent of time spent in general education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Oklahoma, Norman.
Martin, J. E., & McConnell, A. E. (2017). Transition planning. In M. L. Wehmeyer & K. A. Shogren (Eds.), Research-based practices for educating students with intellectual disability (pp. 151-166). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Martin, J. E., Van Dycke J, L., Peterson, L. Y., & Walden, R. J. (2003). Transition of students with disability from high school to post-secondary education: The perfect example. In C. Kochhar-Bryant & D. Bassett (Eds.), Aligning transition and standards-based educational reform (pp. 167-186). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
Neubert, D. A., & Leconte, P. J. (2013). Age-appropriate transition assessment: The position of the division on career development and transition. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 72-83. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/10.1177/2165143413487768
Prince, A. M. T., Plotner, A. J., & Yell, M. L. (2014). Postsecondary transition and the courts: An update. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25, 41-47. https://doi:10.1177/1044207314530469